Skip to main content

TestNG annotations at the class level- can help avoid duplication.

The core of every automation project should include the principle that duplication of anything should not happen at any cost whether it's a duplication of code or data or for that matter anything in fact. Take this example (see pic 1), where we need to execute every method say 5 times each- we all know that it is easily achievable through the TestNG invocation count attribute of the Test annotation. Plus, we want all tests to be re-tried on failure so we can add one more attribute of Test annotation of TestNG i.e. retry analyzer. I truly believe this is a case of duplication where each method @Test annotation is using 2 attributes: invocation count and retry analyzer. Did you know that TestNG allows annotations to be used at the test class level to fix this duplication issue? I agree that it's not required always at class level but in case you need it, please follow. Here, the methods do not have any annotation or attributes because it's getting inherit from the class. In this case (see pic 2), when you execute the Example class, all its tests run 5 times and are retried in case of any failure. hashtagseleniumautomation hashtagtestNG hashtagautomationtesting hashtageasier hashtagtipsandtricks hashtagtesting hashtagapiautomation hashtagavoidDuplication



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Verbose attribute in testNG or POM.xml (maven-surefire-plugin)

At times, we see some weird behavior in your testNG execution and feel that the information displayed is insufficient and would like to see more details. At other times, the output on the console is too verbose and we may want to only see the errors. This is where a verbose attribute can help you- it is used to define the amount of logging to be performed on the console. The verbosity level is 0 to 10, where 10 is most detailed. Once you set it to 10, you'll see that console output will contain information regarding the tests, methods, and listeners, etc. <suite name="Suite" thread-count="5" verbose="10"> Note* You can specify -1 and this will put TestNG in debug mode. The default level is 0. Alternatively, you can set the verbose level through attribute in "maven-surefire-plugin" in pom.xml, as shown in the image. #testNG #automationTesting #verbose # #testAutomation

How to Unzip files in Selenium (Java)?

1) Using Java (Lengthy way) : Create a utility and use it:>> import java.io.BufferedOutputStream; import org.openqa.selenium.io.Zip; import java.io.File; import java.io.FileInputStream; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.zip.ZipEntry; import java.util.zip.ZipInputStream;   public class UnzipUtil {     private static final int BUFFER_SIZE = 4096;     public void unzip (String zipFilePath, String destDirectory) throws IOException {         File destDir = new File(destDirectory);         if (!destDir.exists()) {             destDir.mkdir();         }         ZipInputStream zipIn = new ZipInputStream(new FileInputStream(zipFilePath));         ZipEntry entry = zipIn.getNextEntry();         // to iterates over entries in the zip folder         while (en...

Stop Overengineering: Why Test IDs Beat AI-Powered Locator Intelligence for UI Automation

  We have all read the blogs. We have all seen the charts showing how Generative AI can "revolutionize" test automation by magically resolving locators, self-healing broken selectors, and interpreting UI changes on the fly. There are many articles that paints a compelling picture of a future where tests maintain themselves. Cool story. But let’s take a step back. Why are we bending over backward to make tests smart enough to deal with ever-changing DOMs when there's a simpler, far more sustainable answer staring us in the face? -             Just use Test IDs. That’s it. That’s the post. But since blogs are supposed to be more than one sentence, let’s unpack this a bit. 1. Test IDs Never Lie (or Change) Good automation is about reliability and stability. Test IDs—like data-testid ="submit-button"—are predictable. They don’t break when a developer changes the CSS class, updates the layout, or renames an element. You know...