Comparison of maven-surefire-plugin and maven-failsafe-plugin: References : Maven Failsafe Plugin: https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-failsafe-plugin/index.html Maven Surefire Plugin: https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html Someone asked me then what is the advantage of using one over the another. The advantage is the way they fail: Failsafe > runs all the integration tests, but if any tests fail during the integration-test phase, the plugin does not fail the build immediately. It still executes the post-integration-test phase. Therefore we can still perform any cleanup and environment tear-down as part of the post-integration-test phase. The subsequent verify phase of the build process reports any test failures. Surefire > It binds with the test phase, in case of any test failures, the build fails, and no further phases execute during the build process.
A blog about my testing stories where I pen down my thoughts about test automation covering primarily Selenium, Java, Rest Assured, Karate, Maven, TestNG, Postman, newman, Jenkins, Git, Azure DevOps, etc.