Skip to main content

Context Engineering: The Future of AI Agents (And Why Prompt Engineering Isn’t Enough Anymore)

 Over the past year, Prompt Engineering has been the darling of the GenAI world. Tweak your prompt, get a better answer. Add more detail, get more context. Sounds great, right?

If you’ve ever tried building AI agents that go beyond answering one-off questions — like automating test scenarios, helping with workflows, or making decisions across tools — you’ve probably hit a wall.

And that’s where Context Engineering comes in. It’s not just the next trend — it's the foundation of truly intelligent AI agents.

Prompt Engineering: Great for Questions, Not for Thinking

Let’s start with what prompt engineering is good at.

You give an LLM a prompt like:

“Generate test cases for the login functionality with username, password, and forgot password link.”

And it delivers. Job done — right?

But what happens when your application has:

  • Dynamic changes in functionality

  • Reuse of components across modules

  • Test dependencies that evolve over sprints

  • Or user preferences like test coverage types, tools, or environments?

Prompt engineering falls apart here because it’s a stateless interaction. Every prompt starts from zero — no memory, no continuity, no evolution.

Context Engineering: The Brain Behind the Agent

Context Engineering is about providing structured, persistent, and dynamic context to an LLM or AI system so it can make decisions like a human would — not just answer questions.

It’s the difference between chatting with a bot and working with a teammate.

Here’s what it brings to the table:

  • Task memory (remembers what’s been done)

  • Awareness of constraints and goals

  • Multi-step reasoning

  • Integration with tools, APIs, files

  • Adaptability to change

It’s how you build AI agents that plan, learn, and improve — not just generate outputs.

Real Example: From Prompt to Context in QA Automation

Let’s say you’re building an AI assistant for test case management.

With Prompt Engineering:

“Write test cases for checkout page.”

Cool. You get 5–10 decent test cases.

With Context Engineering:

  • The AI knows your product domain (e-commerce)

  • It remembers past test cases for related modules (cart, login, payments)

  • It analyzes recent code changes via Git

  • It checks requirements from uploaded BRD or JIRA tickets

  • It understands your testing framework preferences (like Selenium + Java)

  • It suggests which test cases to reuse, which to create, and which to retire

Now you have an actual testing agent, not a glorified search engine.

Think of It This Way...

ScenarioPrompt Engineering Context Engineering 
Writing one-time test casesGreatGreat
Adapting tests to code changes❌ Needs manual re-prompting✅ Auto-adapts based on repo context
Handling ongoing testing workflows❌ Loses memory, lacks continuity✅ Remembers, evolves, adapts
Acting like a QA teammate❌ Feels robotic✅ Feels collaborative

Why Context Engineering Is the Future of AI Agents?

As AI shifts from content generation to autonomous task execution, agents need to think, remember, and adapt. That’s not possible without managing context intelligently.

Prompting is like giving instructions. Context engineering is like giving your AI a brain and a workspace.

Whether you're building agents for:

  • Testing workflows

  • DevOps automation

  • Customer support assistants

  • Internal copilots

…context is the secret sauce that transforms an LLM from clever to capable.

The real question is:

“What does your AI agent know, remember, and adapt to over time?”

That’s where the future lies — and that’s what context engineering makes possible.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Verbose attribute in testNG or POM.xml (maven-surefire-plugin)

At times, we see some weird behavior in your testNG execution and feel that the information displayed is insufficient and would like to see more details. At other times, the output on the console is too verbose and we may want to only see the errors. This is where a verbose attribute can help you- it is used to define the amount of logging to be performed on the console. The verbosity level is 0 to 10, where 10 is most detailed. Once you set it to 10, you'll see that console output will contain information regarding the tests, methods, and listeners, etc. <suite name="Suite" thread-count="5" verbose="10"> Note* You can specify -1 and this will put TestNG in debug mode. The default level is 0. Alternatively, you can set the verbose level through attribute in "maven-surefire-plugin" in pom.xml, as shown in the image. #testNG #automationTesting #verbose # #testAutomation
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Unzip files in Selenium (Java)?

1) Using Java (Lengthy way) : Create a utility and use it:>> import java.io.BufferedOutputStream; import org.openqa.selenium.io.Zip; import java.io.File; import java.io.FileInputStream; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.zip.ZipEntry; import java.util.zip.ZipInputStream;   public class UnzipUtil {     private static final int BUFFER_SIZE = 4096;     public void unzip (String zipFilePath, String destDirectory) throws IOException {         File destDir = new File(destDirectory);         if (!destDir.exists()) {             destDir.mkdir();         }         ZipInputStream zipIn = new ZipInputStream(new FileInputStream(zipFilePath));         ZipEntry entry = zipIn.getNextEntry();         // to iterates over entries in the zip folder         while (en...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stop Overengineering: Why Test IDs Beat AI-Powered Locator Intelligence for UI Automation

  We have all read the blogs. We have all seen the charts showing how Generative AI can "revolutionize" test automation by magically resolving locators, self-healing broken selectors, and interpreting UI changes on the fly. There are many articles that paints a compelling picture of a future where tests maintain themselves. Cool story. But let’s take a step back. Why are we bending over backward to make tests smart enough to deal with ever-changing DOMs when there's a simpler, far more sustainable answer staring us in the face? -             Just use Test IDs. That’s it. That’s the post. But since blogs are supposed to be more than one sentence, let’s unpack this a bit. 1. Test IDs Never Lie (or Change) Good automation is about reliability and stability. Test IDs—like data-testid ="submit-button"—are predictable. They don’t break when a developer changes the CSS class, updates the layout, or renames an element. You know...
Post a Comment
Read more