Skip to main content

How to pass a variable value between Azure Pipeline jobs (within the same stage)?



Since the jobs operate in different namespaces, passing variable values between them is unlike passing a variable value from one function to another.

In the example below, $app_Token is the variable name that needs to be sent from one job to another job but within the same stage.

This issue can be resolved by dynamically storing the variable in the variable library and retrieving its value from there. The task.setvariable command, which is illustrated below, is required to store variables using PowerShell in the Azure Pipeline library.


Full example:

 # Maven

# Build your Java project and run tests with Apache Maven.
# Add steps that analyze code, save build artifacts, deploy, and more:
# https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/devops/pipelines/languages/java

trigger:
- master

stages:
- stage: VariableUpdateAutomation
jobs:
- job: Set_AppTokenValue
pool:
vmImage: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- task: PowerShell@2
name: Set_AppTokenValue
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
$app_Token = '$(APPTOKEN)' #Reading APPTOKEN variable value
Write-Output "The app token value till now is: $app_Token"
$app_Token = "ABCDE12345"
echo "##vso[task.setvariable variable=AppToken;isOutput=true]$app_Token"
#Updating app_Token value from ABCDE12345 with the value that we have in variables

- job: Get_AppTokenValue
dependsOn: Set_AppTokenValue
variables:
- name: BSAppToken
value: $[ dependencies.Set_AppTokenValue.outputs['Set_AppTokenValue.AppToken'] ]
pool:
vmImage: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- task: PowerShell@2
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
echo "Value of AppToken in this Job is = $(BSAppToken)"

Note: This task variable only pertains to that stage. The task variable value cannot be used directly in the new stage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The use of Verbose attribute in testNG or POM.xml (maven-surefire-plugin)

At times, we see some weird behavior in your testNG execution and feel that the information displayed is insufficient and would like to see more details. At other times, the output on the console is too verbose and we may want to only see the errors. This is where a verbose attribute can help you- it is used to define the amount of logging to be performed on the console. The verbosity level is 0 to 10, where 10 is most detailed. Once you set it to 10, you'll see that console output will contain information regarding the tests, methods, and listeners, etc. <suite name="Suite" thread-count="5" verbose="10"> Note* You can specify -1 and this will put TestNG in debug mode. The default level is 0. Alternatively, you can set the verbose level through attribute in "maven-surefire-plugin" in pom.xml, as shown in the image. #testNG #automationTesting #verbose # #testAutomation

How to Unzip files in Selenium (Java)?

1) Using Java (Lengthy way) : Create a utility and use it:>> import java.io.BufferedOutputStream; import org.openqa.selenium.io.Zip; import java.io.File; import java.io.FileInputStream; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.zip.ZipEntry; import java.util.zip.ZipInputStream;   public class UnzipUtil {     private static final int BUFFER_SIZE = 4096;     public void unzip (String zipFilePath, String destDirectory) throws IOException {         File destDir = new File(destDirectory);         if (!destDir.exists()) {             destDir.mkdir();         }         ZipInputStream zipIn = new ZipInputStream(new FileInputStream(zipFilePath));         ZipEntry entry = zipIn.getNextEntry();         // to iterates over entries in the zip folder         while (en...

Stop Overengineering: Why Test IDs Beat AI-Powered Locator Intelligence for UI Automation

  We have all read the blogs. We have all seen the charts showing how Generative AI can "revolutionize" test automation by magically resolving locators, self-healing broken selectors, and interpreting UI changes on the fly. There are many articles that paints a compelling picture of a future where tests maintain themselves. Cool story. But let’s take a step back. Why are we bending over backward to make tests smart enough to deal with ever-changing DOMs when there's a simpler, far more sustainable answer staring us in the face? -             Just use Test IDs. That’s it. That’s the post. But since blogs are supposed to be more than one sentence, let’s unpack this a bit. 1. Test IDs Never Lie (or Change) Good automation is about reliability and stability. Test IDs—like data-testid ="submit-button"—are predictable. They don’t break when a developer changes the CSS class, updates the layout, or renames an element. You know...